Skip to main content
Iru Identity is a cloud service built to be the trustworthy center of your access. Below is how the service is built and what that means for reliability and isolation.

​
Two planes, separated by job

The platform is split into two independently deployed services that share a common, layered core. Keeping privileged provisioning apart from per-tenant request traffic shrinks the blast radius of each.

​
A disciplined, layered core

Both services are built in Go on a four-layer architecture with a one-directional dependency rule:
1

Foundation

Infrastructure utilities (database, crypto, sessions, tracing). Depends on nothing above it.
2

Domain

Business logic per entity (users, applications, policies…). Depends only on foundation.
3

Usecase

Orchestrates multiple domain services for complex flows.
4

REST

HTTP handlers and middleware, the only layer that speaks the wire.
The layering is a documented, review-enforced convention (backed by linting and directory structure), not a compiler-guaranteed invariant. We call that out honestly rather than overclaiming.
Testing follows the same discipline: pure business logic is unit-tested without mocks, and behavior is validated by integration tests that run against a real PostgreSQL database, so tests exercise the same row-level security and audit behavior that runs in production, not a stubbed approximation.

​
Hosting and hardening

Iru Identity runs on AWS, with a security-hardened deployment:

Hardened containers

Services run on AWS Fargate as non-root with a read-only root filesystem, no-new-privileges, and all Linux capabilities dropped.

No standing database passwords

The application connects to managed PostgreSQL (Amazon RDS) using short-lived IAM authentication tokens. There is no static DB password to leak.

Secrets stay out of code

Credentials and signing keys are injected from a managed secret store at runtime, never committed to the repository or stored in the database in plain text.

Scanned supply chain

Container images are scanned for vulnerabilities in the CI pipeline before they can ship.
Static assets are served through a CDN (Fastly), and short-lived preview environments for testing run on Google Cloud Run.

​
Two regions, real data residency

Iru Identity operates in two isolated regions (United States us-east-2 and European Union eu-central-1), and residency is enforced in code, not by convention.
  • Every tenant is pinned to a region, stored on the tenant record.
  • The database layer holds separate connection pools per region and routes every transaction by the tenant’s region. A request whose region can’t be resolved is rejected. It never silently falls back to another region.
  • Region-specific data operations (such as seed data) are gated so they can’t run against the wrong region.
The result: an EU tenant’s data is read and written only against EU infrastructure. See Multi-tenant isolation for how isolation continues inside each regional database.

​
Built to stay up, and to be observable

A dependency-free liveness endpoint lets the orchestrator probe without touching the database or auth. On shutdown, services stop accepting traffic and flush tracing, error reporting, and database connections in order.
Connection pools are tuned and bounded, ping their database at startup, and fail fast if it’s unreachable rather than serving broken requests.
Account provisioning to your apps runs through an outbox and reconciliation loop in cancellation-aware background workers, so downstream changes are retried until they succeed instead of being lost.
Requests are traced with OpenTelemetry from HTTP through application code down to the SQL query, and structured logs are correlated by tenant and trace ID. Errors are captured centrally with sampling to balance fidelity and cost.
Schema changes are embedded, version-ordered, and checksum-verified (a changed, already-applied migration is a hard failure). A standing checker proves every table’s audit journal stays in sync with its live schema.

​
Where to go next

Multi-tenant isolation

How row-level security and append-only auditing keep every tenant’s data separate and tamper-evident.

Authentication architecture

Phishing-resistant sign-in, signed requests, and how SSO trust is established.

Security & privacy

The guarantees these mechanisms add up to.

System architecture

The customer-facing view of how identities and sign-in flow.